AI-Powered Multi-Agent System for Intelligent Tech Stack Recommendations
My AI agents are analyzing your requirements...
My AI-powered multi-agent system will analyze your project requirements and provide comprehensive, production-ready recommendations across four critical domains. Each specialized agent examines your needs from different perspectives to deliver actionable insights.
Analyzes: Data volume, query patterns, consistency requirements
Provides: Database recommendations (PostgreSQL, MongoDB, etc.), schema design strategies, scaling approaches (sharding, replication), caching strategies, and connection pooling guidance
Analyzes: Traffic patterns, scalability needs, deployment complexity
Provides: Cloud provider recommendations (AWS, GCP, Azure, Railway), architecture patterns (microservices, monolith, serverless), compute resources, deployment strategies, load balancing, and CDN setup
Analyzes: Infrastructure requirements, budget constraints, growth projections
Provides: Detailed cost breakdowns across providers, monthly/annual estimates, cost optimization strategies (reserved instances, spot instances), scaling cost projections (2x, 5x, 10x), and budget management recommendations
Analyzes: Data sensitivity, compliance requirements, threat landscape
Provides: Threat modeling (STRIDE analysis), security controls for each threat category, compliance guidance (GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, SOC2), encryption strategies, access control recommendations, and security monitoring setup
| Tier | DAU Threshold | RPS Threshold | Compute | Deployment | Architecture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STARTER | < 1,000 | < 10 | 1-2 small instances (2 vCPU, 4GB RAM) | Single region, simple setup | Monolith |
| GROWTH | โฅ 1,000 | โฅ 10 | 3-5 medium instances (4 vCPU, 8GB RAM) | Single region with load balancing | Monolith or modular |
| SCALE | โฅ 50,000 | โฅ 100 | 10-20 instances with auto-scaling | Multi-AZ, caching layer | Microservices or hybrid |
| ENTERPRISE | โฅ 500,000 | โฅ 1,000 | 50+ instances, kubernetes cluster | Multi-region, global CDN | Microservices with mesh |
| Tier | DAU Threshold | QPS Threshold | Recommendation | Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMALL | < 10,000 | < 100 | Single instance with read replicas | Basic setup, good for startups |
| MEDIUM | โฅ 10,000 | โฅ 100 | Primary + read replicas, caching layer | Load balancing, improved performance |
| LARGE | โฅ 100,000 | โฅ 1,000 | Sharded setup, dedicated caching | High availability, distributed data |
| ENTERPRISE | โฅ 1,000,000 | โฅ 10,000 | Multi-region, auto-sharding, CDN | Global scale, maximum performance |
Formula: QPS = max(10, DAU ร 0.015 / 60)
Assumptions:
Example: For 1,000,000 DAU โ QPS = 1,000,000 ร 0.015 / 60 = 250 QPS
Infrastructure Requirements by DAU:
| DAU Range | Instances | Instance Type | Storage (GB) | Bandwidth (GB/month) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 10,000 | 2 | Small | 50 | 100 |
| 10,000 - 99,999 | 4 | Medium | 200 | 500 |
| 100,000 - 499,999 | 10 | Large | 500 | 2,000 |
| โฅ 500,000 | 20 | XLarge | 1,000 | 5,000 |
| Component | AWS | GCP | Azure | Railway |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small instance | $20 | $18 | $21 | $10 |
| Medium instance | $35 | $32 | $38 | $20 |
| Large instance | $70 | $65 | $75 | $40 |
| XLarge instance | $140 | $130 | $145 | $80 |
| Storage (per GB) | $0.10 | $0.09 | $0.11 | $0.05 |
| Bandwidth (per GB) | $0.09 | $0.08 | $0.10 | $0.05 |
| Managed Database | $50 | $45 | $55 | $10 |
| Load Balancer | $20 | $18 | $22 | Free |
| NAT Gateway | $35 | $30 | $35 | Free |
| Service | Cost | Enabled When |
|---|---|---|
| CDN (CloudFlare/CloudFront) | $20 | DAU > 10,000 |
| Cache (Redis/Memcached) | $15 | DAU > 10,000 |
| Monitoring (Basic) | Free | Always |
| Monitoring (Standard) | $50 | DAU > 50,000 |
| Monitoring (Premium) | $150 | Optional |
| Backups | $10 | Always |
| Logging | $10 | Always |
| Secrets Management | $5 | Always |
| DNS | $1 | Always |
Total Monthly Cost Formula:
Total = (Instances ร Instance Price) + (Storage ร $per_GB) + (Bandwidth ร $per_GB) +
Database + Load Balancer + NAT Gateway + Service Costs
Location: backend/src/orchestration/workflow.py
Techniques Used:
Performance: 1-5ms per query
Location: backend/src/rag/vectorstore.py
Algorithm: Vector Similarity Search with Cosine Distance
Process Flow:
User Query โ Text Embedding (384-dim) โ Qdrant Vector Search โ Cosine Similarity โ Metadata Filtering โ Top-K Retrieval
Model: sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2
Performance: ~30ms per RAG retrieval (embedding + search)
Location: backend/src/agents/database.py
Algorithm: Multi-factor tier classification
Decision Tree:
if DAU โฅ 1M or QPS โฅ 10K โ Enterprise
elif DAU โฅ 100K or QPS โฅ 1K โ Large
elif DAU โฅ 10K or QPS โฅ 100 โ Medium
else โ Small
Outputs: Tier, estimated connections, cache recommendation, sharding strategy, replication approach
Complexity: O(1) - constant time decision tree
Location: backend/src/agents/cost.py
Algorithm: Linear cost model with provider-specific multipliers
Formula:
Total Monthly Cost = Compute + Storage + Database + Bandwidth
Provider Multipliers: AWS (1.0x), GCP (1.09x), Azure (1.05x)
Complexity: O(1) - lookup table + simple arithmetic
Location: backend/src/agents/security.py
Algorithm: Weighted risk scoring with priority matrix
Risk Factors:
Risk Score = Data Sensitivity (40%) + Public Exposure (25%) + Compliance (20%) + Architecture Complexity (15%)
Risk Level: โฅ70 = CRITICAL, โฅ50 = HIGH, โฅ30 = MEDIUM, else LOW
Threat Prioritization: CRITICAL (SQL injection, data exposure), HIGH (CSRF, XSS), MEDIUM (DDoS), LOW (info disclosure)
Complexity: O(n) where n = number of compliance requirements (typically < 5)
Location: backend/src/agents/conversation.py
Algorithm: Contextual completion tracking with structured questioning
Completion Calculation:
Completion = app_type (40%) + dau/scale (40%) + key_features (20%)
Ready when completion โฅ 80%
Strategy: Prioritize missing critical fields โ Provide structured options โ Extract entities โ Avoid redundancy
Complexity: O(k) where k = number of conversation turns (typically 2-5)
Location: backend/src/orchestration/workflow.py
Pattern: Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) with shared state
Execution Flow:
parse_query โ database_agent โ infrastructure_agent โ cost_agent โ security_agent โ synthesize
State Management: Shared TypedDict state accumulates results from each agent
Complexity: O(n) where n = number of agents (currently 5, sequential execution)
Location: backend/src/core/logging.py
Algorithm: Cumulative metrics with daily aggregation
Cost Calculation (Claude 3 Haiku):
Cost = (input_tokens ร $0.00025 + output_tokens ร $0.00125) / 1000
Average: ~$0.0015 per query (~6,250 tokens)
Metrics: Prometheus-format counters and gauges for tokens, cost, queries (per agent and daily totals)